2008 November |

Archive for November, 2008

Bihar Flood Relief Camp

Dist.Com. Varanasi Camp For Bihar Flood Victims. The slideshow shows the nobel work done by AICPS CHD district committee Varanasi in flood effected areas of Bihar.

Popularity: 10% [?]

November 8, 2008 Posted Under: Latest Activity Read More

A anti drug campaign was initiated on 18 october 2008. The camp was visited by Chief Guests SSP Nawashahr(Mrs. Shashi Prabha Devidi) along with civil surgeon , drug inspector, Mr.Matharu and other representatives of AICPS from Chandigarh.

Popularity: 11% [?]

November 1, 2008 Posted Under: Uncategorized Read More

recent entries
recent comments
archives

Join Us on Facebook
Contact Address

All India Crime Prevention Society CHD.
Head Office
#3021,Ajanta Ennclave,
Sector 51-D,
Chandigarh. 160047
Head Office Phone no. Call time 10am - 5pm

email - aicps_chd@yahoo.com, WebSite:-www.aicps.org

AICPS CHD. Society has recieved good wishes, messages from President of India, Ministry of Home Affairs, Governors, and Director General of Police of various States etc. click Here
All offices mentioned were as held by them during diamond jubilee.

Mr. K. R. Narayanan

Mr. L.K. Advani

B.K.N. Chhibber

A.S. Bhatotia

S.Parkash S. Badal

S.Sarabjit Singh I.P.S.

Sh.Prem Kumar Dhumal

S.Jasbir S. Ahluwalia

Raja Narinder Singh

Sh. Satya Pal Jain

Sh.Balram Ji Dass Tandon

S. Sewa Singh Sekhon

Sh.A.P. Bhatnagar

Dr.Kiran Bedi

S.M.S. Bitta

Mr.K.L. Gupta I.P.S.

Mr.Pawan Kumar Bansal

Mr.K.L. Likhi, IPS
All state Activities
Life Members
KNOW YOUR RIGHTS

All INDIA CRIME PREVENTION SOCIETY CHD AICPS LEGAL DEPARTMENT GUIDELINES REGARDING ARREST According to Judgments of Ho’nble Supreme Court of India To all the Directors General of Police All the states of Union of India for Implem&ntation
Need for Guidelines Arrest involves restriction of liberty of a person arrested and therefore, infringes the basic human rights of liberty. Nevertheless the Constitution of India as well as International reasonable procedure established by law under which alone such deprivation of liberty is permissible. Although article 22(1) of the constitution provides that every person placed under arrest shall be informed as soon as possible the ground of arrest and shall not be denied the right to consult and be defended by a lawyer of his choice, and s.50 of the code of criminal procedure,1973 (Cr. PC) requires a police officer arresting any person to “forthwith communicate to him full particulars of the offence for which he is arrested of other grounds for such arrest,” in actual practice these requirements are observed more in the breach. Likewise, the requirement of production of the arrested person before the court promptly which is mandated both under the Constitution [Article 22(2)] and the cr. PC [Section 57] is also not adhered to strictly. A large number of complaints pertaining to Human rights violations are in the area of abuse of police powers, particularly those of arrest and detention. It has, therefore, become necessary, with a view to narrowing the gap between law and practice, to prescribe guideline regarding arrest even while at the same time not unduly curtailing the power of the police to effectively maintain and enforce law and order, and proper investigation. PRE-ARREST . The power to arrest without a warrant should be exercised only after a reasonable satisfaction is reached, after some investigation, as to the genuineness and bonafides of a complaint and a reasonable belief as to both the person’s complicity as well as the need to effect arrest. {Joginder Kumar’s case-(1994) 4 SCC 260}. . Arrest cannot be justified merely on the existence of power, as a matter of law, to arrest without a warrant in a cognizable case. . After Joginder Kumar’s pronouncement to the Supreme Court the question whether the power of arrest has been exercised reasonably or not is clearly a justifiable one. . Arrest in cognizable cases may be considered justified in one or other of the following circumstances: (i) The case involves a grave offence like murder, dacoit, robbery, rape etc. and it is necessary to arrest the suspect to prevent him from escaping or evading the process of law. (ii) The suspect is given’ to violent behavior and is likely to commit further offences. (iii) The Suspect requires to be prevented from destroying evidence or interfering with witnesses or warning other suspects who have not yet been arrested. (iv) The suspect is a habitual offender who, unless arrested, is likely to commit similar or further offences. {3rd Report of National Police Commission}. Except in heinous offences, as mentioned above, an arrest must be avoided if a police officer issues notice to the person to attend the police station and not leave the station without permission. (See Joginder Kumar’s case (1994) SCC 260. The power to arrest must be avoided where the offences are boilable unless there is a strong apprehension of the suspect absconding. Police officers carrying out an arrest or interrogation should bear clear identification and name tags with designations. The particulars or police personnel car. Raying out the arrest or interrogation should be recorded contemporaneously, in a register kept at the. Police station. ARREST . As a. rule Use of force should be avoidea while effecting arrest. However, in case of forcible resistance may be used. However, care must be taken to ensure the Cit injuries to the person being arrested, visible or Otherwise, is avoided . The dignity of the person being arrested should be U protected. Public’: display or parading of the person arrested should not be permitted at any cost. . Searches of the person arrested must be done with due respect to the dignity of the person, without force or aggression and with care for the person’s right to the, privacy. Searches of women should only be made by other women with strict regard to decency. (S.51 (2) Cr. PC.) . The use of handcuffs or leg chains should be avoided and if at all, it should be resorted to strictly in accordance with the law repeatedly explained and mandated in judgment of the Supreme Court in Prem Shanker Shukla v. Delhi Administration (1980) 3 SCC526 ) and Citizen for Democracy v. State of Assam (1995) 3 SCC 743). . As far as is practicable women police officers should be associated where the person or persons being arrested are women. The arrest of women between sunset and I’ sunrise shoulder be avoided Where children or juveniles are sought to be arrested, no force or beatings should be administered under any circumstances. Police Officers may for this purpose, associate respectable citizens so that the children or juveniles are not terrorised and minimal coercion is used. . Where the arrest is without a ‘warrant, the person arrested has to be immediately informed of the grounds of arrest in a language which he or she under stands. Again, for this purpose; the ‘police, if necessary ‘may take the help of respectable citizens. These grounds must have already been recorded in writing in police records. The person’ arrested should be shown the written reasons as well and also given a copy on demand. (5.50 (1) Cr. PC.) . The arrested person can, on a request made by him or her, demand that a friend, relative or other person known to him be informed of the fact of his arrest and the place of his detention. The police should record in a register the name of the person so informed. [Joginder Kumar's case (supra)]. . If a person is arrested for a boilable offence, the police officer should inform him of his entitlement to be released on bail so that he may arrange for sureties. (S.50(2) Cr. PC.) . Apart from informing the person arrested of the above rights, the police should also inform him of his rights to consult and be defended by a lawyer of his choice. He should also be informed that he is entitled to free legal aid at state expense [D.K. 8asu's case (1997) l SCC] . When the person arrested is brought to the police station, he should, if he makes a request in this regard, be given prompt medical assistance. He must be informed of this right. Where the police officer finds that the arrested person is in a condition where he is unable to make such request but is in need of medical help, he should promptly arrange for the same. This must also be recorded contemporaneously in a register. The female requesting for medical help should be examined only by a female registered medical practitioner. (S. 53 Cr. PC.) . Information regarding the arrest and the place of detention should be communicated by the police officer affecting the arrest without any delay to the police control Room and District/State Headquarters. There must be a monitoring mechanism working round the dock. . As soon as the person is arrested, police officer effecting the arrest shall make a mention of the existence or non¬existence or any injury(s) on the person of the arrestee in the register of arrest. If any injuries are found on the person of the arrestee, full description and other particulars as to the manner in which the injuries were caused should be mentioned in the register, which entry shall also be signed by the police officer and the arrestee. At the time of release of the arrestee, a certificate to the above effect under the signature of the police officer shall be issued to the arrestee. . If the arrestee has been remanded to police custody under the orders of the court, the arrestee should be subjected To medical examination by a trained Medical Officer every 48 hours during his detention in custody by a doctor on the panel of approved doctors appointed by Director, Health Services of the concerned State or Union Territory. At the time of his release from the police custody, the arrestee shall be got medically examined and a certificate shall be issued to him stating therein the factual position of the existence or non existence of any injuries on his person. POST ARREST . The person under arrest must be produced before the appropriate court within 24 hours of the arrest (ss. 56 and Cr. PC.) . The person arrested should be permitted to meet his lawyer at anytime during the interrogation. The interrogation should be conducted in a clearly identifiable place, which has been notified for this purpose by the Govt. The place must be accessible and the relatives or friend of the person arrested must be informed of the place of interrogation taking place. The methods of interrogation must be consistent with the recognized rights to life, dignity and liberty and right against torture and degrading treatment. ENFORCEMENT OF GUIDELINES 1. The guidelines must be translated in as many languages as possible and distributed to every police station. It must also be incorporated in a handbook, which should be given to every policeman. 2. Guidelines must receive maximum publicity in the print or other electronic India. It should also be prominently displayed notice board, in more than one language, in every police station. 3. The police must set up a complaint redressal mechanism, which will promptly investigate complaints of violation of guidelines and take corrective action. 4. The notice board which displays guidelines must also indicate the location of the complaints red ressa I mechanism and how that body can be approached. 5. NGOs and public institutions including courts, hospitals, unviersitites etc., must be involved in the dissemination of these guidelines to ensure the widest possible reach. 6. The functioning of the complaint redressal mechanism must be transparent and its reports accessible. 7. Prompt action must be taken against errant police 1Officers for violation of these guidenlines. This should not be limited to departmental enquiries but also set in motion the criminal justice mechanism. 8. Sensitisation and training of police officers is essential for “effective implementation of the guidelines.