What is AICPS?

Lt. S. Gurmukh Singh (Freedom Fighter)
(1912 – 1998)

(Ex-Royal Air Force before partition founder of the AICPS 1946 at Karachi and Lahore)


Before partition Pre-independence period 1946, All India Crime Prevention Society came into existence and was first organized. Its founder members were Late S.Gurmukh Singh and his associate Late Sh.Sampurnanand and Dr.Paripurnanand, younger brother of Chief Minister Utter Pradesh, pionneer of open prison system in India, Sh.Shiv Mangal Singh Kapoor MLA associate of Pt. Govind Valabh Pant, former home Minister, Government of India and his son Sh.B.S.Kapoor in a team were directly involved in the society. The above personalities run the office of All India Crime Prevention Society Regd,No.-63/1950-51. The said Society was running smoothly for the 12 years up till the death of Dr.Paripuranand and there after his death the society was almost vanished .

The  Ministry  of  home  Affairs, Govt.  Of  India   Vide  its    GO No. 90/50/police, April 26, 1950 and  36/32/56 police Dec.10,1958  has directed the states to Utilise  the  services of “All India Crime Prevention Society in every manner’ s

To know complete history of AICPS and its founder before the patrician Late S. Gurmukh Singh  click here





अखिल भारतीय अपराध निरोधक समिति का जन्म -1946 Click Here


AICPS सदस्यता के फॉर्म और नियम हिन्दी में  Click Here



A.S.MatharuSh. Avtar Singh  S/O  Late Sh.Gurmukh Singh   


Founder of All India Crime Prevention Society Chd 

Which the society had directed by The  Ministry  of  home  Affairs, Govt.  Of  India   Vide  its    GO No. 90/50/police, April 26, 1950 and  36/32/56 police Dec.10,1958  has directed the states to Utilise  the  services of “All India Crime Prevention Society in every manner’ s

That the All India Crime Prevention Society Formed by late Sh. Gurmukh Singh (Father of Sh. Avtar Singh  President & Chief Executive Board of Governors) the Society in 1946. Dr. Paripurnanand Verma belong to varanasi was an associate of Late Sh. Gurmukh Singh  founder. After the death of Dr. Paripurnanand Verma the office of society at 1/5 Gokhle Marg, Lucknow-226001 has been faded away and closed.

The Branch office of the society at G-1, Anand Niketan, New Delhi-110021, running by Sh. Nigam folded his office due to non-availability of the paper of the society and found fail when demanded by the S.S.P. Chandigarh.

The Papers of the society were with Late Sh. Gurmukh Singh and these were surfaced the same document relating to All India Crime Prevention Society which were Approved by the Govt. of India and Sh. Avtar Singh  son of Late Sh. Gurmukh Singh founder of the Society produced this record before the Deputy Commissioner, Chandigarh Administration who authenticated these documents by Sh. K.K.Khandelwal on 02.04.1998, then the Society got Re-Registration Memorandum of Association & by Laws of All India Crime prevention Society Chandigarh CLICK HERE


Diamond Jubilee Public & Police: A Seminar in Chandigarh Click Here

Most Cordially invite you attend a national level

AICPS acknowledges gratefully the kind Massages of good wishes from the following dignitaries’ like President of India, Deputy Prime minister of India, Governor of Punjab &Chandigarh Administration, CM of Punjab, CM of Himachal Pradesh, Three Cabinet Minister of uttar Pradesh, Jt. Commissioner of Police, Delhi, IGP Commandos Punjab, IGP Bhagalpur, Addl. DGP Pb. Human Right Commission

Seminar 1998 in Chandigarh Government wishes Click Here

Mr. K. R. NarayananMr. K. R. Narayanan
(President of India)
symbol Govt. Of India Mr. L.K. AdvaniMr. L.K. Advani
(Former homes  Minister)

Lt. S. Gurmukh Singh (Freedom Fighter)(1912 – 1998)(Ex-Royal Air Force before partition founder of the AICPS

Date of Death 17th Nov. 1998

aicps logo 30-8-2016

A.S.MatharuSh. Avtar Singh  S/O Late Sh.Gurmukh Singh







A.S.MatharuSh. Avtar Singh  

S/O Late Sh.Gurmukh Singh

National President & Chief Executive Board of Governor

All India Crime Prevention Society Chandigarh 

SH. Kuldip Singh Minhas

S/O Late Sh.S. jagir singh;
(IAS Retd.)

All India Crime Prevention Society Chandigarh, Chairman


S/O Late Sh.H.R. Suman 

(PCSCJM Retd.)

All India Crime Prevention Society Chandigarh Senior Vice President


S/O Late Sh. Manohar Singh

(Air Commodore-Indian air force)

All India Crime Prevention Society Chandigarh Senior Vice President

SH. H.S. Virk

S/O Late Sh. G.S.Virk (I.P.S. Retd.)

All India Crime Prevention Society Chandigarh Senior Executive President



S/O Late Sh. Harsarup 

(Prof.)(Former Professor /Director Correspondence Education)

All India Crime Prevention Society Chandigarh Senior Executive Correspondence President

Shri. B.S. Danewalia (IPS Retd.)

Former IGP (Jt. Punjab)

All India Crime Prevention Society Chandigarh Senior Executive  

B. B. Mahajan I.A.S.(Retd.)

Ex. Sect. Agriculture Govt. Of India

All India Crime Prevention Society Chandigarh Senior Executive




“AICPS” Under Legal Advisory

Committee President


Constitution & by’s Laws Committee AICPS Head Office Chandigarh supporting Advocate Members, “AICPS” all over India & Abroad under validity I-Card holder can approach under Legal required Written Complaint Application received by “AICPS”. Click Here




June 29, 2013 Posted Under: Uncategorized   Read More




B.B.MahajanB. B. Mahajan I.A.S.(Retd.)

Ex. Sect. Agriculture Govt. Of India

As we are all aware, police performs a very essential function in civil society. It has to protect life, liberty & property of citizens & ensure and order without which no social, economic or political progress is possible. Just as man does not live by bread alone, a Society does not live by low & order alone nevertheless, just as man cannot live for long without bread, a civilized society cannot survive for long without an environment of reasonable peace & order.A relationship of mutual trust & co-operation between police and people is necessary for efficient performance of its onerous duties by the police. Such as relationship is sadly lacking in India.  The Common Man perceives police force as inefficient, corrupt & oppressive. The Common perception is that the police neither takes adequate preventive measures to prevent crime or investigation crime effectively to nab the culprits nor prosecutes them diligently to secure their conviction. The poor & the weak often dread to even visit a police station to register a crime. The general belief is that police, like rest of the administration, moves only if the aggrieved party is either rich of influential. The Policeman is believed to be busy collecting bribes for them self or their political masters. And the force is used for oppression by the rich against the poor, the strong against the weak & the politician in power against his opponent rather than for protecting the poor & the weak. Citizens cannot be expected to have healthy relationship with the police as long as the perception. Rooted large in reality, persists, not withstanding any no. Of public relations gimmicks & courtesy weeks.The reasons for such a state of affairs are well known. Policeman is appointed not by fair selection but by dint of their relationship with influential persons or by bribery. They are ill-trained, ill-equipped & overworked. Forensic aids are inadequate so that they have to depend on third degree method in investigations. Police officers from DGP down to SHO’s are arbitrarily transferred after brief tenures because of pressure of powerful politicians them of in supported of other who covet their post. Lucrative police stations are auctioned to highest bidders. Honest Official is harassed & the unscrupulous are rewarded.The remedial measures required are also self evident. Appoint policeman on merit through fair selection, give them proper training & aids, give officers at al levels & stable tenure of a reasonable length & make them accountable for the state of crime in their area, rewards the honest & the efficient & punish the corrupt and the inefficient promptly & severely.The question is why such measures are not taken & conditions allowed to deteriorate. The basic reason must be sought in our polity. Power in a democracy ultimately vests, quite rightly, in elected political leaders. These leaders get elected after spending a lot of money. They have a limited tenure, which also sometime gets cut short prematurely. Thanks to our hypocritical belief that they are there to serve the people & therefore need not be adequately paid. And they are all human. So their natural instinct is to use their power not only to recoup investment made by them in their election & activity in the intervening period between elections. But also to make handsome profit, particularly in view of the extremely risky natures of the investment. They therefore try by use of state apparatus to make as quickly as much money as they can for themselves, their relatives & political supporters (whose help will be required at the next election). They will also need money again form their rich friends at the time of next election & must, therefore help them while in power. They have also to build up their business interests as a security against possible upset the next elections. The police being repository of raw power of the state become an important instrument for achievement of these objectives. And since people at the top use police force for collecting money for themselves, their Relative & friends and for furthering their interests, it is only natural that officials down the line also use their powers for similar purposes.An independent judiciary & a free press do exercise some restraining influence but given a strong will a way can generally be found. The fear of losing power at the next election is a major deterrent, however its strength gets blunted so long as the politician feels reasonably confident that the can deflect the attention of the voters from the ill of omission & commission in Governance to issues of caste, region or ideology or can rig the election by booth capturing, bogus voting, scaring away voters of the opponents or use of money power.What is the remedy for this state of affairs? If the Above analysis is correct, any lasting improvement. Will take place take only when the politician is convinced that it is in his interest to effect the improvement & he is enabled to do so. For this be will have to reduce the compulsion to used state power for personal gain & increase the risk of such misuse. Implementation of the proposal for state funding of election & further measures by the election commission to reduce the expenditure on election should reduce the amount of investment to be recouped. A substantial increase in the emolument of legislators & ministers would likewise eliminate the need for supplementing those by unlawful means. The aim should be to create a situation in which a politician can remain honest if he so wishes without going bankrupt. Further tightening of the election process to eliminate rigging of elections by use of muscle & money power will increase the risk of realising the power of their vote, start making the politicians in power accountable for the efficiency, honesty & impartiality of the police force in their area; this will act as strong incentive for making necessary improvement. A healthy trend in this regard is already. Visible with voters throwing out state Govt. Of the party at power at the centre for its failure to check the price of onions & rejecting the candidate for Lok Sabah of the party in power in a state where they were dissatisfied with its performance in the state. Some political analysts have lamented this tendency to mix up the local & national issues. However, on balance it is a healthy trend as it would send single to al political parties in power, whether at local, state or centre level, to ensure good governance. Present is an opportune time to strengthen this trend. With near consensus on major economic & political issues between major contenders for power. The voters can now give greater weight to the quality of governance. N.G.O.s like this society & the media can play a useful role in strengthening this trend by political education of the masses about the use of vote for bringing about an honest, efficient &people friendly administration & by bringing out unbiased surveys about the state of crime in different state & regions. A world of caution here. It wills not safe to reply one on figures of registered crime. For then the easiest way to show improvement will be not to registered crime at all, particularly from the week & the less powerful. Once the politicians in power are convinced that it is impartial police force, the situation can improve dramatically. And Healthier relationship between police & the people will follow.

October 22, 2018 Posted Under: Uncategorized   Read More